5 out of 100  

I was watching one of my favorite YouTube channels named JK news and they were discussing an article about this girl who was set up with this guy by a friend. Although little did she know that this guy had set up 5 more dates 45 minutes apart from various dating sites. So she and the other girls decided to tell the girls the situation and invite them to have drinks with them instead. Great story right but the interesting part was the reaction of the girls discussing the article and the guys. The girls reaction was he's an asshole and good for the girls for making a bad situation a great girls night out. While the guys reaction was, he's an asshole but how did he manage to get six dates in one night? Then one of the male host said something that peaked my interest. On these dating sites 5 out of 100 guys get all the dates while the rest stuggle to get 1 person who is interested in them.

Of course the girls disagreed saying that maybe their approach was the cause of their stuggle but the 5 out of 100 seems to be more accurate in my first hand opinion. But why does this seem to be the case?

Then it hit me. It's the lack of scarcity. Women can be a lot more picky because of the seemingly endless possibilities for a partner. In real life a woman has only a few romantic options and over time those romantic options begin to shrink so she has to compromise or end up with no one but in the digital age there are so many options there is no need for compromise. You can find a guy who is 6'3 with a master's degree, a high paying career, and in great shape. Why would you settle for a guy who is 5'6 with a high school diploma, I shit paying job and who is overweight. So the 5 out of 100 guys get so many messages they are cocky, flakey, or sexually aggressive because they have 100 more messages from girls they can choose from so one woman so upset at them she stops communication isn't a big deal.

Or I could be totally off the mark. Do you think the 5 out of 100 is a valid assessment?